The two most recent collective bargaining agreements between the NFL and the NFLPA have been both a blessing and a curse for young quarterbacks.
Beyond the fact that rookie passers no longer immediately become the highest-paid players in the league if they are drafted early, there have been huge repercussions for young signal-callers as a result of the structured salary arrangement.
On the positive side of the ledger, since younger quarterbacks are now cost-effective, relatively speaking, teams are now anxious to get them on the field and maximize the relative value they offer at the position. The old school mentality of a rookie quarterback holding a clipboard and “learning by watching” is out the window. They play as early as possible, learning by doing instead, and teams use dollars that were previously allocated to the rookie quarterback’s salary elsewhere.
That has also spurred offensive innovation. If you have to play these young QBs, many of whom come from offenses that some consider not exactly “pro style,” you see new schematic elements work their way into the NFL. A “trickle-up” theory of offensive innovation, if you will.
But there is a downside.
Specifically, moving on from a mistake – real or perceived – is less costly for an organization.
NFL organizations, especially those commonly selecting in the first ten picks of the NFL Draft each year, are not generally known for their patience. Whether is comes from ownership, the fanbase, or a combination thereof, teams that have struggled usually lack the ability to handle a slow process of improvement. These organizations might not have the stomach to handle the learning curve with a young QB.
In the past it was difficult to also stomach moving on from such a player when their contract made them one of the highest-paid players in the league. SO teams would chase good money after bad, often holding on to the hope that the QB would turn things around.
Now? Teams are starting to realize they can move on almost immediately. Josh Rosen in Arizona is one such example, and it seems that Dwayne Haskins in Washington is about to become another. Haskins was benched this week, and the stories emerging out of the nation’s capital seem to point towards an eventual break between him and the organization. Haskins was sidelined during practice this week – forcing him to watch Steven Montez take snaps instead of him – and then was inactive on Sunday with a stomach illness.
Sunday also provided reports that the team was looking to trade him, according to Jason LaCanfora of CBS Sports.
If the team does move the second-year passer, what are the best landing spots for him, in terms of his development and potential as a QB?
Watch: Russell Wilson beats Vikings with 94-yard fourth-quarter drive
Falcons fire head coach Dan Quinn, general manager Thomas Dimitroff after 0-5 start
Giants safety Logan Ryan: ‘The worst thing that happened today’ was Dak Prescott’s injury
San Francisco has lost as many games as it did in the 2019 regular season
Dak Prescott’s brother posts photo of QB smiling in hospital